Before getting into the nuts and bolts of the transition from Windows to Macs, I want to lay out a non-exhaustive set of First Principles that I think make a law office productive, efficient and a fun place to work. These principles are limited to software. (There are other First Principles relating to ergonomics, how staff treat clients, how staff treats staff, a few rules about personal hygiene–but I’ll pass over those for now.) If we’re clear about what makes a law office run well, it makes it a lot easier to evaluate the merits of moving to the Mac. So here are my Six First Principles for technological goodness in a small law office.
The First of the First Principles
The core software programs are integrated.
Integration means that (1) there should be as little duplication of data entry as possible and (2) there should be a seamless means of accessing that data across programs. If we enter a client’s name, address, telephone number, social security number, etc. in our case management software, that data (or some subset of it) should be accessible to our e-mail program, our word processor and our billing and trust accounting programs. And if we send or receive facsimiles and e-mail, they should be easily associated with the proper client or contact. Integration reduces data entry errors and speeds the flow of work.
The Second First Principle
Case management software facilitates integration.
That means that the most important program on your computer is your case management program. Case management software manages contacts, cases, calendars, documents, e-mail and faxes. It handles the merging of client and contact data with all kinds of documents as well as the transfer of data to billing and trust account programs. It does these things seamlessly and without requiring eight keystrokes to get a particular task done. It has the flexibility to store large amounts of unique data on a particular client or case, through the use of customizable fields.
Good case management software facilitates integration. Bad case management software makes you want to throw your computer out the window.
The Third First Principle
The data stored in your case management program is easily merged into letters, pleadings and briefs.
Lawyers produce tons of documents. An efficient law office merges client, case and contact data into all kinds of word processing documents. Merging is the sine qua non of a good case management program. Without the ability to merge data into sophisticated documents, law firms can still function . . . in the same way that a 737 can fly with one engine out. But it’s not the ideal.
The Fourth First Principle
The software you use needs to look good and work intuitively.
One of the most attractive features of the Mac is that its features are attractive. If you ever get a chance to browse Apple’s Human Interface Guidelines, you’ll find out why. In about 900 pages, it covers the philosophy and psychology of computer use from an Apple perspective. It’s a fascinating read. (Not that I’ve read it–I just gave it a really thorough skimming.)
The point is, there are good reasons why the Mac interface is clean, uncluttered and bright. A cheerful interface means a cheerful staff. Form (if supported with good substance under the hood) can drive better function. And that has all kinds of positive implications for your practice. Apple understands that. So Apple encourages independent developers to design products following its human interface guidelines.
The Fifth First Principle
When you hit a key or click a button, stuff happens.
The software and the OS on which it runs should produce fast, reliable responses to user input. Poorly designed software is a big drag on productivity. If your case management program, like Marley’s ghost, is bound by a ponderous coil of chain, your staff will not be happy. On our network, for example, it is not uncommon to wait 7-15 seconds to go from one client record to another client record in TimeMatters. (Could this have been one of the catalysts that led me to buy a Mac? Hmmm.) Anyway, after trying everything we could think of and consulting with the experts, we simply live with it. Well-designed software runs fast and reliably over a network.
The Sixth and Final First Principle
All all relevant data is easily accessible and all reports are easily generated.
It doesn’t do us much good getting data into a program when we have to struggle to retrieve it. Good case management software makes it easy to get data in and get data out, in lots of different forms, including merged documents, reports and syncs with PDAs.
So that’s a set of First Principles by which to judge a law office setup. I’m sure there are additional Principles and maybe a few corollaries or caveats I haven’t thought about. If I think about them, I’ll revise the list. For now, this should give me enough to (1) judge my existing setup and (2) determine if the Mac will make it better. So in the next post, I’ll spend some time comparing the Ideal law office to my own Reality.
Sorry to hear about your frustration with Time Matters. I understand that was a factor in your move to the Mac.
I’m curious what Mac software you are using now that meets your First Principles requirements?
Thanks - R
Robert:
I’ll be discussing that very issue in a future post. Will survey what I’m currently using and products I have demo’d or intend to demo. But I’m on vacation right now, and it’s snowing so it’ll be next week before I get that online. Cheers.
We are independent TM consultants and we hate to see someone so frustrated that they leave the fold. Especially hate to see someone turn their back on PCs all together!
Your frustration must have been great. I wish we could have had the opportunity to try to help you before it was too late.
That said, we do get attorneys ask us about Mac legal software from time to time. The general consensus seems to be that there are too few attorneys trying to run their firms on Macs to to fund development of any software that is really competitive with what is available for the PC (based on your *very good* 1st principles).
In addition to being TM consultants, we also have a product (PC) that we have developed in house specifically for PI attorneys (www.caseworth.com). It is not as DB intensive as Time Matters so it isn’t as demanding on a machine or the network. I expect it would run fine on a Mac in emulation. I’m working on testing that by the way. I just wonder how many Mac attorneys will be willing to, or be forced to, run emulation on their Mac just to have access to the software they need. I can tell you that in 2+ years of selling CaseWORTH we have only gotten maybe 2 inquiries about a Mac version. This level of interest certainly could not support development costs for a Mac specific parallel product.
Sorry for the digression, but my point is as a legal s/w mfg, I’m very interested to see how your project works out. I genuinely hope you will be able to find the tools you need. It is especially interesting to me since you understand the capabilities of TM even if you had trouble with the product. In my mind this gives you a unique perspective from which to evaluate other products - whether on the Mac or not.
So I will be watching your experiences closely. Thanks for sharing with the community. If there is anything I can do to help you please ask.
- Robert
PS: Have a nice vacation, and quit checking your email!
not as powerful as TM but very functional is Bill4Time - completely web based and safari/IE/Firefox compatible.
I have a bit of insight into the Mac vs. PC issues, having been a member of the development team for the original IBM PC, AND a co-founder of the world’s first Mac user group, as well as having run information technology shops from 2 to 260,000 desktops.
As a manager told me years ago, “In GOD we trust; all other’s bring data.” Personally having tracked total cost of ownership on hundred’s of thousands of computers, I can empirically state that the 3 year life cycle cost of a Mac is between 10 and 25% of a PC. The more of the back end infrastructure removed from Windows servers, the lower the cost. Mac servers are indistinguishable from Winservers to Windows desktops, are better integrated, take a fraction of the management effort, and eliminate the nightmare of MS Server software, like Exchange. (which, BTW, typically costs 20 times more almost any other mail/collaboration server to manage).
I’ve worked with over 50 major companies as a consultant or executive, as well as many, many professional offices, and I have yet to see an exception to these cost figures.